Medical Directorships: Documentation That Holds Up in an Audit

Medical directorship agreements are common in physician enterprise operations, but too often, they’re loosely written, vaguely scoped, or missing key elements. That creates risk when auditors come knocking.

In this session, you’ll get a dual-lens perspective: one from the compliance and regulatory side (Leard Mita) and one from the operational and clinical side (Dr. Paul Fu). Together, they’ll unpack what makes a directorship agreement complete, fair, and audit-ready. You’ll learn how to define deliverables, align with FMV, and maintain defensible documentation, without overcomplicating your process or adding admin burden. It's a chance to see how policy and practice can actually align, because too often, they don't.

We’ll also preview how emerging tech can help link deliverables to timekeeping and surface gaps before they become audit liabilities.

Note: This session is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

Agenda:

• What defines a medical directorship (vs. clinical work)
• Common gaps in documentation: scope, deliverables, and time logs
• FMV considerations specific to directorships
• Risks of vague, outdated, or copy-paste agreements
• What auditors actually look for and how to be ready without creating unnecessary work
• Live Q&A

This Session is Built For:

• Compliance Directors & Analysts
• Physician Enterprise Leaders
• Contract and Credentialing Coordinators
• Legal and Risk Team Members

Reserve Your Spot

Whether you’re reviewing old agreements or preparing for your next audit, this session will leave you with practical insight and help you assess if it’s time to modernize how your team handles documentation.